"Life itself is the proper binge." Julia Child
Disclaimer: I am not qualified to give medical or dietary advice, or indeed any other type of advice, so if it all goes pear-shaped, or if you do, it is entirely your fault! Be responsible for yourself and don't blame me, OK? And see a doctor if you haven't exercised for a long time or if you are planning on going on some really stupid diet scheme. Maybe even see a psychiatrist, I don't know.
I suppose many of us have tried to lose weight and failed. I know I have. That seems to be normal. The typical mantra, "eat less, exercise more," while obviously true, equally obviously seems to be an almost unattainable goal to most people, given the results they obtain. The commonly recommended low fat, high carbohydrate diet seems to produce similarly dismal results. But, I seem to have succeeded at last. Not only have I lost my surplus weight, it seems to be staying off and I am much fitter than I have been since I was a teenager. So, I thought I would take the time to describe what I have done. Maybe something similar will work for you too, if that is what you want. Pretty much, I started from scratch, deliberately not paying attention to the "eat less, exercise more" people since that method had always failed me in the past for two simple reasons: I couldn't bring myself to eat less for more than a short time, and it was too much effort to exercise more. But, I found a way of doing both, long-term and painlessly. E-mail me! The method involves three stages:
Skip the first two and you might as well not bother with the third. In fact, if you are going to try to apply my method to yourself, I suggest you don't even bother going on a "diet" until the first two are well and truly in place. But you can if you like, of course. Step 1: The MindKey words: go slow, habits, lapses, emotions, conditioning, self-esteem. Most people do exactly what is necessary to prevent their diets from working right from the outset. They leap right in to some ridiculously strict regime, starve themselves silly, then beat themselves up when their willpower inevitably cracks under the strain. How to avoid this? Simple: don't do it. Note: until you do think that is simple, and fully understand what I describe below, you are not ready to move on to Steps 2 or 3. Seriously: don't waste your time until your mental approach is ready and these concepts are well understood. You already know the results of not doing this from your previous dietary efforts, I'm sure. I knew I needed to lose some weight pretty much right from the time I started putting it on in the first place, but 20 years later, I was still overweight. My efforts limited the extent somewhat, but could not be said to have it under proper control. I became diabetic, presumably brought on by the surplus weight and a diet too rich in carbohydrates. Eventually, the threat of impending health problems caused by the diabetes, in turn caused by the weight, scared me enough to get me looking seriously for a method. I found two in particular, both quite good, it seems to me, although I followed neither exactly: Dr Atkins' New Diet Revolution, and Mauro Di Pasquale's The Metabolic Diet. Atkins' diet is much criticised, I think unfairly, but it certainly works for those who actually read the book and follow his rather precise instructions. In case you don't know, his diet is based on the idea of reducing the carbohydrates (sugars, starches (mainly potato, rice, pasta and bread) and fruit juices) that you eat. His theory about why it works (reducing the body's typical insulin requirements) may be right or it may be wrong, but the results have been proven in normal people. Of course, many people, who haven't got their mental attitude sorted out, don't read it, or decide to eat no carbohydrates even though he makes it clear that you must eat some, they skip his other instructions such as the ones about multivitamin/multimineral supplementation, or the fact that the induction phase should only last two weeks with rare exceptions, then they want to sue his company when they get ill. There are stories about such people in the newspapers all the time. Duh! Anyway, more about Atkins later. The Metabolic Diet is written by an ex-world champion weightlifter and introduces the concept of the "carb load". Both Atkins and Pasquale suggest that burning fat is the thing to do in a diet, since after all it is fat the typical dieter is trying to lose, and both authors do it by reducing the carbohydrates in the diet, forcing the body to burn other substances instead (fat and protein), but Pasquale feels that the body should have a carbohydrate booster about once a week, and maybe after a workout as well, as the carbohydrate causes the body to produce insulin, and that insulin helps to build muscles by feeding protein (amino acids) to the muscle cells. Strong muscles help the body to burn calories faster, and in type 2 diabetics they also help the body to mop up surplus glucose from the blood. They make you look better and feel better too. His method, assuming it works, is to assist the exerciser to build up muscles a little more easily than might otherwise be the case. It is unproven, as he candidly admits, but sounds like it might be true. It also has the probable virtue of preventing the body from adapting to a fixed regime and resisting the diet (as bodies tend to do), because every few days, you change the regime, then change it back again. Nice one! Why am I telling you this? So that you know where I'm coming from. Also, these diets are still open to abuse by people who don't know how to diet (that is, people whose mental approach is all wrong). They prescribe a method which, as with all other diets I have seen, encourages an unsuccessful approach to dieting based on strict adherence to some regime. Such an approach doesn't suit me, and my bet is that it doesn't suit an awful lot of people. Of course, it suits some. But if it suits you, why are you fat? My method is The Lazy Way To Diet (TM) because that's me. If that's you too, read on. I don't know how to describe a more appropriate mental approach to this process in a carefully structured way, so I'll just dash off the points as they occur to me. I may rewrite it all in a slicker fashion one day, but for now, let's just get the info onto the page!
I would suggest reading and re-reading the above section about the Mind at least five times, maybe more, over the next couple of weeks or so, to reinforce the learning. There is quite a lot in there and it is worth not accidentally forgetting something that could turn out to be crucial for you and your process. Step 2: The BodySo now you've got your mind sorted out (you have, haven't you?) it is time to sort out your body. No, not food (not yet): exercise. Yes, exercise. The dreaded "e" word. So, you really, really, don't want to exercise. I know. It is inconvenient. It looks stupid. It is (insert your own best excuse in here). Sure. You don't want to be a "gym rat" like those idiots you see when you pass your local health centre. You want to integrate it into your normal activities so you don't notice it. I know. Above all, you know it will make you feel terrible physically and emotionally while you do it, and indeed afterwards when you fail to do it properly or keep up with your programme. Right? Wrong. If you really think that, then re-read the section about The Mind above, thinking specifically about how it can apply to exercise while you are reading it. If you don't want to re-read it all, at least look at the list of the key words: go slow, habits, lapses, emotions, conditioning, self-esteem. Think about them. What's that? "Go slow?" Hmm... there's a clue there, isn't there? Yep: go for very minor improvements over a long time. Push yourself, but very, very gently. If you find that you are feeling bad physically, such as breathing a bit more heavily than feels OK, then you are probably overdoing it, so ease off! If after some exercise or other you find it takes ages to get your breath back, well, take ages, and maybe don't push quite so hard next time. It is important to know that you will get improvements in your physical health without pushing yourself hard. Sure, many people go to the gym and work like crazy, but it isn't necessary for non-athletes. Any exercise will result in some improvements over time, and giving yourself plenty of time is fundamental to this method. Forget about achieving quick results. Don't even try for them. As long as you are improving your health, however slowly (within reason), that will most likely work out very well for you over a year or two. And, as your body gets fitter, lo and behold! You will be able to work harder anyway, eventually. Working too hard has another disadvantage, anyway, apart from tiring yourself out and feeling unpleasant: you might be more likely to injure yourself and that could keep you out of action for weeks or even months. If you are seriously unfit, or feel that you are, then, if you are able, start out with maybe a 10-minute walk twice a week. Five minutes if that is all you can manage. Decide for yourself what will work for you. This walk should be as brisk as you feel you can manage without making you breathless. You might break out in a light sweat unless the weather is really cold. When you feel you can, extend the walk to 15 or 20 minutes, or make it three times a week, or both. Maybe make it every other day if you can. If you want to, get a heart-rate monitor and have a look at the American Heart Association site, which tells you what sorts of targets to aim for. If you are unfit, it is probably worth the money for a cheap wristwatch/belt monitor so you can be sure you aren't working too hard. A simpler test is that you should be able to hold a conversation without getting breathless. If you have difficulty maintaining the pace just because you find it a bit boring, then take a personal stereo and play some good marching music: disco, house and dance music in particular, with their driving, continuous beats at 60/120 or so beats per minute, are excellent for this as are some driving rock tunes that can get the adrenaline pumping. Slow romantic ballads and New Age music just don't cut it for this purpose, I'm afraid. Classical can be OK if it is exciting enough. If the walk isn't challenging, you are probably fit enough to go to a gym or devise your own exercise routine. And if you don't fancy the gym, there are plenty of alternatives: walking; swimming; tennis; football; badminton; volleyball (including beach volleyball!); dancing; even jogging and running (eventually): pretty much anything that gets you moving (and I don't mean driving a car). You can do traditional exercises too, of course. Be warned, though, that many advances have been made in recent years and numerous exercises that were once thought to be good for you (such as sit-ups) are now considered to be dangerous if not done in a specific way. Therefore, I recommend that if you are thinking of something like this that you go to a good gymnasium for at least a couple of months to get some training from the professional instructors there. Around here, you can join a gym for around £50, plus about £30 a month. Some have a pay-as-you go system whereby you pay about £5 per session instead. They all seem to offer basic health and fitness assessments, whereby the instructors will listen to your goals and try to tailor a programme especially for you, with "free" reviews every couple of months. For example, I told them that I wanted to bring my blood glucose levels under better control, and I didn't want to work too hard because my motivation was weak and I believed that if the exercise made me feel too uncomfortable I would have difficulty maintaining it. They came up with a suitable programme involving a mix of aerobics and resistance exercises, set at fairly easy levels at first, which they increased at each 8-weekly review as my fitness improved. As this is a lifestyle change, I am still going to the gym two years later, and in my mind I consider that I will still be going to the gym forever, or as long as I live, or can, as the case may be. I allow that I might switch to exercising outside the gym at some point instead, of course, but the lifestyle change as such is for life. If you can't or won't go to the gym but are prepared to exercise elsewhere, well, the Internet is your friend and you could do worse than start here for information about weights and here for aerobics. If you still feel that you can't bring yourself to exercise, forever, then go back to The Mind section and spend a bit more time getting yourself used to the idea. You probably need to condition yourself to this novel notion and it is not surprising that it could take a while (six weeks?) of thinking about it before you are ready to start. But do think about it: hold the idea in your mind, and come back to it often. Try to become accustomed to the idea of your exercising, simply by thinking about it often and perhaps making plans relating to it and indeed explaining to yourself in a loving manner just what it is all for and considering how to get started. See yourself going to the gym (or doing whatever form of exercise you think you might manage - playing tennis, swimming, cycling and so on). Keep seeing yourself doing these things for a few days or weeks until you have grown accustomed to the idea. You will find that it is an easy way to get used to a 'new you' beforehand. It takes a bit of time, but it works. And because it works, it actually takes less time that trying things that don't work, like forcing yourself to go, for example. That is how I conditioned myself and it certainly worked for me. Those two categories I mentioned above, weights and aerobics, also sum up the two types of exercise you will need to be doing however you decide to go about getting them into your life. "Aerobic" exercise is for the cardiovascular system, that is, your heart and circulatory system. Aerobic exercise is all about sustained effort such as walking, cycling, swimming, running and so on. This sort of exercise raises your heart rate and keeps it up for a time, typically, half an hour twice a week at least, once you are up to that basic minimum level of fitness. This form of exercise reduces your risk of heart attack, burns calories, reduces fat and generally helps you to feel fitter when performing simple daily activities such as walking up stairs (after a time you will find that you no longer get particularly breathless when doing such things). The other sort of exercise, using either free weights or machines that offer resistance to your muscle-building efforts, is "resistance" exercise, which strengthens your main muscle groups. The point of this is not just to make you stronger and better-looking, although it does this, it also reduces your body fat percentage by gradually increasing the proportion of your body that is muscle, and it increases your metabolic rate causing your body to burn more fat than before, because fit muscles burn more calories than unfit ones. A virtuous circle again. Note that as muscles weigh more than fat, your weight can actually go up while you are building muscle and reducing fat, but in this case it is not a bad thing for your health and you will end up looking better too, as your body tones up and your shape changes. You might consider getting a body fat measuring device such as an electronic meter or callipers, just to make sure that it isn't an increase in fat that is causing any weight gain. If you do then remember that these gadgets are not all that accurate and you may have to take the average of several readings over time to get a fair idea of what is going on. If in doubt, swap a couple of your normal meals for salads: that always seems to shed a bit of weight for me. Whatever exercises you do, it is important that you do them well. By that, I mean that you should do them in the proper manner: what the athletes call "good form." This reduces the risk of injury and improves the benefits of the exercises too by ensuring that the specific muscles the exercise is supposed target are actually the ones that get exercised the most. It might help to think of the exercise as an art form, and as you exercise you are creating physiological art, so naturally you will want it to be good art. Well, it works for me, anyway! :-) Find a way to think about it that works for you and your good form will increase your benefits accordingly. One much neglected aspect of good form is cooling down after aerobic exercises. For example, many people, after walking or running for 20 minutes on the treadmill, just punch the stop button and step off. This is very dangerous and can cause a heart attack on the spot. You can't tell these people, because unasked for advice is seldom welcome, but at least you know now. The reason is that when you are exercising hard, your heart is pumping hard to supply all your body with oxygen. However, what is little realized is that your other muscles are also pumping hard, and they too help to pump blood around the body, assisting the heart with its labours. If you stop suddenly, your body's oxygen demands are still high for a minute or so, but your heart is no longer getting that extra help from the other muscles so it has to try and pump harder still. But if you have been exercising too close to your limits, you might find that your heart can't pump any harder and you could faint or have a heart attack. The solution to this is to slow down over the course of a couple of minutes. All the aerobic machines, if they are any good and have been set up correctly, will terminate their programmes with a cool-down phase where they run more slowly or at an easier level for a minute or two, so just carry on at the slower/easier pace for one or two minutes and save yourself a potential crisis. If you are sensitive to these things, you will know if you are slowing down too quickly because you will feel your heart begin pounding harder as you ease off: don't slow down any more for a bit! If you have to stop suddenly for some reason, at least take a few deep breaths to supply extra oxygen (not too much or you could hyperventilate and faint from that instead), or run on the spot or something for a few seconds at least. The other sort of cool-down that is needed is stretching the muscles after exercising. The main benefits of this are a (possible) improvement in flexibility as stronger muscles can tend to shorten a bit over time if not stretched; and a reduction in aches and pains over the next couple of days while your muscles rebuild and strengthen themselves after the exercise session. This is less essential than the aerobic cool-downs, but it is one that most gyms will tell you about. For some reason, they don't seem to know about the importance of the aerobic cool-downs around here; certainly they have never explained it to anyone in my hearing. Stretches are often recommended for warming up too, but there is little evidence that it does much good, and it may reduce your sensitivity to pain as well, thus increasing your risk of injury. It is a controversial question in some circles, anyway. Do them if you feel that they benefit you but be aware that your sensitivity to pain from the exercises may be reduced slightly. I stretch beforehand if the particular muscle to be exercised is feeling a bit stiff. Another aspect of form I see much neglected is not to "bounce" or bend your body to assist with any exercises. For instance, if stretching to touch your toes, don't stretch further by bouncing or you are very likely to injure your back (in this case). If lifting a weight, don't jerk various parts of your body about to make the lift easier: keep your body still and try to use only the target muscle group and the necessary secondary muscles. Keep your back straight, lift with your leg muscles, don't bend over to pick things up or put them down (especially weights) and so on. Make it a point to learn about good form and do it, for your own protection. Like many other skills, exercise is one that can be done badly, but you will suffer badly too, if you do it that way. In general, the key is to listen to your body, all the time. You can trust it to tell you if you are going wrong: any twinge or strain or pain when doing something is a strong hint: you are close to doing too much, or you are doing it incorrectly. Experiment if necessary, but correct the error immediately. If you are getting too breathless, ease up. And so on. Pay attention. Finally, never, ever, exercise if you are feeling unwell, even if you only have a mild cold. Not only could you pass it on to others if you are at a gym, but it can make the infection do you serious damage. Viruses in particular are the culprits here. It seems that if you exercise while you have a virus infection, it can encourage the virus to attack the heart muscle, something that they don't generally do too much. A weakened heart muscle is something you definitely don't want. And, if you weaken it, then go and do your normal cardiovascular routine next session - you could seriously overdo it without realising it, and have an attack. The advice I have seen is to leave it at least a week after your resting heart rate has returned to its normal level before returning to exercising, and resume at a lower level than you left off until you see how it goes. It may take you a couple of weeks or more to get back to where you were. To measure your resting heart rate, try to see what it is on waking, before you move. That could be a bit difficult. Otherwise, try and measure it at various times (preferably by wearing a measuring device - they are quite cheap these days, available from sports or electronics goods shops) and take the lowest reading. When your body is fighting an infection, you will find your heart rate is raised significantly. Don't go back to exercising until a week after it has returned to its previous level (or very close to it, if it looks like it isn't going to go back that low).
Whether you are diabetic or not, unless you really do find it necessary, or you are getting a bit over-tired, you don't particularly need to be providing yourself with extra carbohydrates when you exercise, as the point is to get your body to burn fat. If you provide it with carbohydrates to burn instead, it will in most cases burn them preferentially (raised insulin levels, caused by eating, especially by eating carbohydrates, suppresses fat burning). Perhaps I should finish this section with a sample beginners' exercise programme, gymnasium-style. You will need to adapt it to your own circumstances and ideally will get advice from a trained professional and your doctor before beginning. For example, if you are very unfit, you might just do a short walk as I suggested earlier, and perhaps add more of the aerobic exercises to your routine as your health improves. Similarly with the resistance exercises, do low weights, low numbers of repetitions or fewer sets, as defined below. Whether you want to get advice or go to a gym or go swimming, dancing maybe, at least start slowly and listen to your body at all times. It knows better than your brain just what it can and can't manage.
The routine below is given as an example only. It may look a bit daunting, but remember you are not going to be pushing yourself harder than you feel comfortable with at any time, right? Also, the exercising of one muscle doesn't tire out the ones you are not using so it is not as bad as it looks: you can switch from one exercise to the next without too much trouble (you will probably want to rest for a minute or two between exercises even so, especially at first. I still do. When I get to the next machine I set it up as I want it and then sit there for a while until I am ready). In theory, you would normally be advised to do all of the following twice a week at least, but you might want to break yourself into it more gently, depending on your general health and your mental and emotional attitudes. Whichever way you get started, increase the level of intensity and duration or weight as you get fitter. If you end up not improving after say 3 months on a given exercise, seek assistance if you don't think you have reached your full potential or if you would like to do more. In the case of resistance exercises, if you seem to be getting weaker, reduce the number of sets or repetitions a little and see if that helps. You may be overdoing it so that your muscles are not having time to rebuild fully before you go at it again. If a given weight seems easy, increase it. If it is too difficult to start with, reduce it. If the resistance exercises are too much for you to recover from even so, split them into two groups exercising the lower and upper halves of your body on separate days. Change your exercise programme a little every couple of months as your body will get used to it and it is better for your health if you keep challenging it with new routines. Seems like a lot, doesn't it? It will take a couple of hours, generally, but you will soon get used to it and believe me, you won't suffer much provided you don't push yourself too hard. Promise yourself that you will go easy on yourself and will ease up on any exercises that are giving you trouble. Once you are fitter, you will not need to go so easy, but at first, if you are anything like me, going easy is essential if only for psychological reasons! For what it is worth, in my own exercise routine, I have settled on two sets of 12 repetitions for most exercises. For one or two, I seem to be able to manage three sets of 15, and in the case of the abdominal roll, two sets of 20, sometimes three sets. Vary them for yourself as suits your own body. Why exercise? See the notes about fat, below. There's no point in repeating it here! Step 3: FoodAh, yes... food. That staple of the diet and health industry. What can you eat? Answer: anything you like! Yes, anything you like! The solution isn't in avoiding certain foods so much as in portion control. That means, limiting the quantities of unsuitable foods, or eating them less often. Also, instead of actually eating less, you can substitute better foods for the ones you are limiting. That way, you can still eat plenty of food so you don't go hungry and you still eat the things you like reasonably often so you don't feel deprived. I hope that sounds good to you. It has certainly worked for me. If you know much about dieting, you may be wondering how, if you can eat plenty of food, you will be reducing calories enough to lose weight. After all, at the end of the day, you need to eat fewer calories, or burn more, if you are going to lose weight. Well, the answer seems to be two-fold. First of all, the exercises you are doing will be causing you to burn more calories, both during the exercise sessions and afterwards as your fit muscles will burn more even when you are resting. Secondly, with a suitable choice of foods, your appetite can be suppressed a little bit, resulting in you actually choosing to eat less without it requiring any effort on your part. Now the scientific evidence about which foods are best for suppressing appetite is contradictory. Indeed, I get the impression that much of the science that has been done in the field of diet and weight control is pretty poor, which, no doubt, is part of the reason that much of the advice given by medical professionals and others simply doesn't work or isn't practical for mere humans and this no doubt does much to explain the obesity epidemic afflicting much of the developed world (along with our overeating and underexercising habits, of course). I actually consider the dietary advice that they give to diabetics is positively dangerous (suggesting that they base their meals around starchy foods when plainly their bodies can't handle such meals properly), but who am I to contradict a trained professional, even though by ignoring them and going my own way I am one of the tiny minority of diabetics to have brought my weight and my diabetes under what I think of as pretty good control (described by my doctor as "excellent" control)? Pity they don't usually include disclaimers like the one at the top of this article when they dispense their advice, isn't it? Instead they seem to pretend that what they are saying is The Ultimate Truth. Well, it isn't. I am telling you this not only to vent my spleen but to emphasise that what I am telling you is based upon my own, personal, experience. To what degree you can generalise it and apply it to yourself is (of course) entirely up to you to decide. This isn't The Ultimate Truth either, but I am not pretending that it is. It might work for you though, so see what you think. Basically I took some lessons from Dr Atkins' diet plan, modified a bit with some occasional mild carb loading from the Metabolic Diet mentioned earlier, and modified some more because I am diabetic and carbohydrates are even more of a nuisance to me than to the average person. Also, not wishing to use too much willpower, I ignored Atkins' very strict "Induction Phase" and went straight for the "Maintenance Phase" minus a little bit of food. In reality, I probably cut my calories by about 100 to 200 Calories per day from my normal level. But, I didn't count Calories at all, and ate whenever I was hungry (and still do). For those of you who don't know the Atkins method, or have only read the nonsense that is in the mass media, here is a potted summary of what he says. Any mistakes and misinterpretations in this are my fault, not his, of course, but they are the ideas that I picked up and used, right or wrong. OK. I will start off with a summary of typical meals that I may eat in a day, then follow that with some general dietary advice amounting to a short list of foods that are in or out. Items marked with an asterisk, like this* are items dieters and diabetics should avoid or eat only in modest quantities as they tend to have a strong effect on raising their blood glucose levels (usually, this means the foods are rich in carbohydrates and are to be had in moderation by all dieters anyway). Items marked ** are to be most strongly avoided by diabetics and other dieters.
You will see from the above that I eat some of the carbohydrate-rich foods I am telling you to limit, such as fruit, for example. These foods are healthy in moderation even for a diabetic such as myself. The point is to keep them under control, that's all. A Word About FatThe low-fat mania is probably misguided according to Dr Atkins, and I agree, and at least one study supports this view. A high-fat diet probably isn't too good either, if the fat is saturated fat (the sort found mainly in meat and milk products), since saturated fats are strongly correlated with cardiovascular problems (heart attacks, strokes, and so on). So, a moderate fat diet is, as mentioned earlier, probably the way to go. What "moderate" means to you, though, I can't say. I am probably still eating too much saturated fat, but that is because I tend to eat out a lot and for breakfast especially, since I can't have cereals and toast with marmalade or honey and cream, I tend to wind up choosing a traditional English breakfast instead. Nevertheless, this diet doesn't seem to have done me any harm. Indeed, the evidence is quite clearly that it has done me good. I have lost a reasonable amount of weight: about 10kg (22lb or so) over the last 18 months, and my body fat percentage is (very slowly) drifting downwards as well. It is currently in the "acceptable" range for men of about 22%, having started around 25%. Even if the percentage had stayed the same, since I am exercising and therefore keeping my muscle mass up, the lost weight must be from burned up fat. Oh, and if you think that 10kg isn't much for 18 months, remember, "slow and steady wins the race!" If you are not familiar with that saying, have a read of The Hare and the Tortoise, where it comes from. Anyway, go at a speed that suits yourself. My mental model (unproven of course) about what the body does is that it will tend to try and conserve whatever you restrict. So, if you go on a low-fat diet and eat lots of carbohydrates (the standard medically approved diet), your body will detect the lack of fat and try to conserve it. Indeed, it is known that insulin, the hormone that helps your body metabolize carbohydrates, also suppresses fat burning. This is logical, since if your body has a ready source of energy in all those carbohydrates you are eating, why would it need to burn any fat? So, it doesn't, in any significant amount, anyway, and shifting it therefore will prove exceptionally difficult. Insulin also converts any carbohydrates that are not burned... into fat, for storage. On the other hand, there isn't much the body can to to conserve carbohydrates as they are stored as fat if they are not burned. So, a restricted carbohydrate lifestyle will help the body to burn fat. Whether the theory is right or wrong, plainly, I have positive results in myself, so the method works, or can work, at least. However, if you have cardiovascular problems, or think that your arteries are well clogged up with surplus fat (and if you have a pot belly or a big bum, you might as well assume that they are), then you may want to proceed with some caution. Don't eat too many saturated fats at first, or at least, cut the visible fat off any meats you eat. Other sorts of fat, as found in fish, nuts and so on, are very good for you, however, and are correlated with reduced risk of heart attacks, etc. So for you, maybe breakfasts of kippers and tomatoes, or pilchards or some such would be a better idea than the traditional English that I enjoy. You will need to experiment. If you are losing weight and you are exercising enough to gain a little strength and cardiovascular fitness, then you can be sure that you are losing fat. But if you are adjusting your food intake and not exercising, you may be losing muscle mass instead or as well, including from your heart, so you could be making yourself dangerously unfit. The exercising part of this sort of lifestyle is not optional for just this reason: your body burns muscle mass as well as fat (and carbohydrates) for energy whenever there is a shortage, so you need to exercise to at least replace the muscle mass - this also helps to prevent that scrawny-chicken look that non-exercising dieters often end up with as their muscles waste away along with the surplus fat. Exercising also burns calories and raises your metabolic rate, but that is not quite so important, although it does help, of course. Closing ThoughtsThis is not a diet, I repeat. As I said at the beginning, it is a lifestyle. A permanent change to your way of living and eating. Make the changes slowly and continuously, backslide a lot but keep pushing a little all the time... and you can get there. Go for it! I would be interested to hear your comments and results. Maybe post them to the Tucana Forum, or e-mail me... I may add some blog functionality to this page too at some point so you can type your thoughts right here... Now here's my closing thought: "If you can't do it by willpower, do it by stealth." Martin Thompson. E-mail me! |
Area 51 Diet & Fitness Discussion Forum Dreams
Enlightenment Fixing PC's Games God Great Depressions
Intuition Life Coaching Links Money Music My Pictures Quotations
Ringamoby.com Sci-Fi Whatever! (Blog) Wonderful
Appendix: Notes for DiabeticsThe following comes mainly from alt.support.diabetes.uk, an Internet newsgroup (a sort of discussion group or bulletin board) for diabetics interested in learning to control the disease or anyone wanting to find out more about it. Other groups well worth a visit include alt.support.diabetes and misc.health.diabetes. Also, alt.support.diabetes.kids is useful if you have diabetic children. The original correspondent had been asking about how to help her diabetic husband, frequently getting blood glucose readings in the 15+ range [270 in US units], who was resisting doing anything to control his condition (a common response to it). This is an edited and extended version of my reply (one of many replies the original poster received). Values in square brackets, [], are the units used in the USA. Other values are SI units, used elsewhere.
|
(Top of page) |
Area 51 Diet & Fitness Discussion Forum Dreams
Enlightenment Fixing PC's Games God Great Depressions
Intuition Life Coaching Links Money Music My Pictures Quotations
Ringamoby.com Sci-Fi Whatever! (Blog) Wonderful